MGB: I do not recall

this guy should be in jail, then waterboarded, although that's no punishment according to Dick Grothen

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/11/02/fbi-report-cheney-uncertain-questions-cia-leak/?test=latestnews

72 times he does not recall? He is FOS... Full of $hit.. amazing that if any police investigator had this used as an excuse during questioning the subject would be charged.. I do not recall is his admission of guilt.. of course we all knew this.. he was instumental in outing Plame who's hubby refuted the Niger claims.. and Darth Cheney didnt like this..
This also shows, that powerful people are held to different laws than the rest of us.. Didnt Bush promise to deal with anyone in his admin... XXXXXX
Makes me sick.. this guy deserves the Japanese style waterboarding since the US version is more humane.. What we do is we sit people up, and use those mist bottles with the fans on the end like you buy at Disney World for your kid $25 a pop in the middle of August to lightly mist the detainee.. its actually refreshing.. certainly not torture.. if they used warm water in the bottle, maybe we could say its less humane.. I hear gitmo is hot.

Oh booo whhooo...go make a sign and protest something.

your such babies...

Anyway, get with reality...Bush is gone, get over it.

[quote=don4975]
Oh booo whhooo...go make a sign and protest something.

your such babies...

Anyway, get with reality...Bush is gone, get over it.[/quote]

name calling... a classic knee jerk reaction from the uninformed.....

Crimes were committed, are we not a nation of laws Don? Or do you only want to apply those laws to political parties you dont agree with... oh lets say the democrats?
Bush maybe gone, but the legacy lives on.. I am sure that you would be OK with any apprarent illegal activites that Obama will do, or has done when he leaves office right?

Since he is the president, and laws dont apply to him?

I think Cheney ought to sodomize you two clowns while the secret service holds ya down,then beat the shit out of ya...I mean..if it was good enough for Bill Clinton....it's good enough for you.......

POPCORN....get yer POPCORN......who wants...POPCORN??? get yer popcorn before the show starts....


IMHO........

[quote=wyatt]
I think Cheney ought to sodomize you two clowns while the secret service holds ya down,then beat the shit out of ya...I mean..if it was good enough for Bill Clinton....it's good enough for you.......

POPCORN....get yer POPCORN......who wants...POPCORN??? get yer popcorn before the show starts....


IMHO........[/quote]
Wyatt, keep your fetishes to yourself, no one here as far as I can tell is into what your into..... there are websites you can visit for that type of stuff, I doubt you ll find it on an MG website.

I have no fetishes.......but I do................"........have a dream"..........

[quote=wyatt]
I have no fetishes.......but I do................"........have a dream"..........[/quote]

The Village people and a couple of seamen?

...I think I sense a..............................HATE CRIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.................. Oh oh...........

[quote=wyatt]
...I think I sense a..............................HATE CRIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.................. Oh oh...........[/quote]


No hate crimes, I thought you liked dancing to their disco hits of the 70s with a couple of strong sailors.. not hating here.. just want to see you have a good time.

we'll have to take this to the tribunal..........i'ts out of my able hands now......but I believe it to be...an EGREGIOUS breach of 21st century civility.

Sorry Wyatt but how do you apply 21st century civility to a people to espouse to live by the 13th century doctrine they've been tought?

so let me get this straight, you righty, Bush luvin apologists hate Obama for crimes you think he will commit in the future, which include:
[list]
[*] creation of storm troopers, who will kill any political dissenters
[*] take the money from the rich, apparently you folks, and give to the poor
[*] initiate a government takeover of all industry
[*] will bankrupt America by providing healthcare for everyone, even the poor
[/list]

yet you approve of GWB, and think nothing should be done for the crimes he DID (thanks Kirk) commit, which include:
[list]
[*] torture
[*] outting of an undercover agent
[*] started an unjustified war
[*] crimes against humanity
[*] the biggest crime of all, taking advantage of simple folk, yes you folks, by getting you to buy all the lies, and to get you simple folk to continue with the beliefs even after being proven as dupes
[/list]

way to go !!! bellybutton lint has more integrity than you folks

JZ...I know nothing......I saw nothing........I was outta town that day.............

LOL, Oh, Joe, this is NOT the Reasonable Argument forum. As they said on Monty Python once upon a time, "It's getting hit on the head lessons in here, Arguments are down the hall".

I always knew the guy was a criminal. It is crystal clear he broke the law,he should be prosecuted

I think he has used I don't recall one half of the times Hillary used in her pretty in pink questioning I think she still holds the record.. I also think he made the right response. If your memory of thousands of documents and meetings are not exact the correct response is I don't recall.

[quote=6863m]
I think he has used I don't recall one half of the times Hillary used in her pretty in pink questioning I think she still holds the record.. I also think he made the right response. If your memory of thousands of documents and meetings are not exact the correct response is I don't recall.[/quote]---------------very incorrect line of thought----read the report ,clearly he knew yet responded "i dont recall" --------------------------Your hero broke the law,hillary is not the issue,the man should be brought to justice. What gets my goat is there are many people in jail because they got caught lieing to the govt yet this windbag gets a pass--------Prosecute him

Steve, there are people just like you who want to prosecute him. That is well known. The prosecuter would love nothing better than to find a conflict and go for obstruction of justice. The right answer to anyone is I don't recall. The article is too speculative. If Cheney did not have the exact context and exact day, minute and words he should answer I don't recall. Scooter Libby is a good example of why you don't guess or try to come close.

People just like me??? So its ok to to lie and delibertly mis-lead,but only if its someone you support. Denial must be difficult

Don,

I totally agree with you but Cheney needs to shut up. If he continues to 'shoot' his
mouth off, he's fair game.

Dave

Fair game is fine with me but also is the phrase I don't recall. If I was in the grand jury room and I was asked about issues 6 years old I would have a flash card. As much as it seems unfair there are no friends in a grand jury room or a media interview.

[quote=6863m]
Fair game is fine with me but also is the phrase I don't recall. If I was in the grand jury room and I was asked about issues 6 years old I would have a flash card. As much as it seems unfair there are no friends in a grand jury room or a media interview.[/quote]

no respect for the law

Joe, it is total respect for the law. You are trying to make it a friendly game between to reasonable men and it is not at all.

[quote=6863m]
Fair game is fine with me but also is the phrase I don't recall. If I was in the grand jury room and I was asked about issues 6 years old I would have a flash card. As much as it seems unfair there are no friends in a grand jury room or a media interview.[/quote]


Richard, you need to get the facts straight here.... stop the spin, stop the dillusion... are you ready?? Are you ready?

It was July 2003 she was outed 2003, DICK was questioned in May 2004.... Do the math.... not 6 years Richard... Again, its not 6 years Richard.. NOT 6 Years.. stop making up crap to fit into your version of reality....

Less than a year.. .got it? Stick to facts not in your Richard fantasy land.

you have no respect for the law Dick, and its equal application of it.

Joe, pretty strong statement, which of my posts would lead you to say I don't respect the law. If I am asked a question it is imparative that I don't lie. So If I am not absolutely positive I know the right answer I should say I don't recall the facts. If the witness answered "well I think this is what happened or I think this is what she said" that the lawyer or prosecuter would accept it.

[quote=6863m]
Joe, pretty strong statement, which of my posts would lead you to say I don't respect the law. If I am asked a question it is imparative that I don't lie. So If I am not absolutely positive I know the right answer I should say I don't recall the facts. If the witness answered "well I think this is what happened or I think this is what she said" that the lawyer or prosecuter would accept it.[/quote]

Mr Grothen, care to explain how you made 10 months turn into 6 years? I would love to see the math.

6863m......don't engage the SOB...he made his point and ethics clear in the other post about school elections..........he has posted for all to read where he stands. He has crossed the line.

[quote=wyatt]
6863m......don't engage the SOB...he made his point and ethics clear in the other post about school elections..........he has posted for all to read where he stands. He has crossed the line.[/quote]


Yeah, crossing the lines with facts is too much for some to handle....

As usual you have so so so much to offer.. thanks, you have done enough today to meet your daily contribution qouta.... you can go play with your SpongeBob Lego set and make the Krusty Krab come to life..... .MMMM Crabby Patties....

I don't care if it is 6 years, 10 months or two days. If he was not absolutely sure of his answer the right answer is "I don't recall". It is a trap and he has to stay out of it.

[quote=6863m]
I don't care if it is 6 years, 10 months or two days. If he was not absolutely sure of his answer the right answer is "I don't recall". It is a trap and he has to stay out of it.[/quote]


Richard... you made the 6 year claim,. I was pointing out the falsehood in that... see someone less sharp would have come in and parrotted your 6 year lies as if it were fact.

Also, when your talking about a CIA agent, and the husband of the man who refuted your claims about yellowcake, surely this is something you would not forget particularly when you used it as a reasoning for war. Seeing that it was major news at the time, and Dick really couldnt have forgotten so quickly...

Apologist 1st class.

Old school Repubicrat policy.

http://www.moldea.com/reagan-gj.html


Twice after Ronnie Raygun stated he had no recollection of Iran Contra he checked into Walter Reed to have a cancer taken off his nose. Pinnocio anyone?

Ronnie also went on the airwaves on national TV and lied to the public.. oh wait republicans dont lie... .I must keep reminding myself of this, I must keep reminding myself of this, I must keep reminding myself of this...

it's called lying for justice, it's a trick they learned from the leftists..it's right out of their playbook......now don't go calling me a liar or I'll have to go look it up and rub it in your face and waste much of my day that could be better spent just dreaming of the summer of 63......