MGB: ...real independence

Jul 04, 2008 06:26:54
wyatt

Happy 4th to all. Lets celebrate real independence, here is just one of many suggestions. I can not over emphisise the importance of free enterprise on this our nations Independence Day.

...Book Review: Plans, Plans and More Plans
Download PDF of the larger publication

They are adorned with audacious titles: Cool Cities, Smart Growth, Economic Growth Authority, Development Corporation, 21st Century Jobs Fund, New Urbanism, etc. etc., ad nauseum. Highly paid "experts" are hired to work up the details. Hollywood actors may even be hired for expensive ads to sell the program, or at least to make the taxpayers think their elected leaders are on top of things. Ribbon cuttings are scheduled for the projects chosen for public subsidy (usually with interesting names such as "AutoWorld"). Press releases flow like water, announcing a few "new" jobs here and a plant opening over there.

Click to enlarge: Best Laid Plans
(Click to enlarge)

What am I talking about? The trappings of government planning — especially the kind where the object of the planning is other people. That means you. It’s a growth industry to be sure. The one thing that’s certain about it all is that government will be bigger after all is said and done, even when the planners fall short or fail, which they almost always do. That’s one important lesson among many from an important new book by researcher and Cato Institute scholar Randal O’Toole, "The Best-Laid Plans: How Government Planning Harms Your Quality of Life, Your Pocketbook, and Your Future."

O’Toole provides abundant evidence, case studies and examples from the United States and abroad, but if he had chosen to focus on Michigan alone, he would have found a cornucopia to demonstrate his points. Since Kim Sigler was governor 60 years ago, state government has piled one plan on top of another to "diversify" the economy, "stimulate" growth, attract this or that industry, or achieve some other grand design. Michigan law books contain nearly 58 separate statutes that have "economic development" purposes, replete with overlapping or duplicative policies that are scattered across state government. The Legislature almost never examines what’s in the books because that’s just not as attention-getting as piling on the next program.

In recent years, the centerpiece of such efforts in Michigan has been the Michigan Economic Development Corp. With the country’s highest outbound migration and unemployment rates, many Michiganians are wondering if the MEDC has been asleep at the switch.

Actually, one learns from O’Toole that although such planners are rarely sleeping, we would likely be better off if they were. Like so many other presumptuous agencies, the MEDC is less about ED (economic development) than it is about PR and self-promotion. As its agencies hold news conferences to pat themselves on the back, state government largely ignores the fundamentals of real growth. Last fall it even slapped a beleaguered state economy with a whopping tax hike.

Think of a state as a gigantic bad restaurant hemorrhaging customers. On the one hand, it can offer discounts or subsidies to a handful of customers if only they’ll stay and eat bad food at a high price. A better option would be to improve the menu and the service and cut the prices for everybody. Planners prefer the former approach because it empowers them to dole out favors to a few. But if that actually worked, Michigan’s sour economy is hardly evidence of it. O’Toole documents the jeopardy to our national forests from Forest Service planners; the exasperating traffic congestion motorists suffer because of urban planners; the displacement of inner-city families by housing planners; the threat to the environment from eco-planners; and a host of other errors writ large. "The bitter irony," he writes, ". . . is that many if not most of the problems the planners propose to solve were caused not by the free marketplace, but by past generations of planners and government bureaucrats."

It’s never enough, however, to simply find blame. One must offer solutions. O’Toole does precisely that, calling not only for repeal of many federal, state and local planning laws but also suggesting specific reforms that can fix stubborn problems without the heavy hand of mandates, edicts and bureaucracy. Privatization of services previously provided inefficiently by government is one such reform that many local governments and school districts have found to be a good economic development tool. Just as his earlier book, "The Vanishing Automobile and Other Urban Myths," has influenced decisions in important places, "The Best-Laid Plans" will likely prompt a rethinking of seldom-questioned planning myths across the country.

A copy of O’Toole’s book should be part of the severance package for MEDC planners.

State and local officials across Michigan can secure a copy of "The Best-Laid Plans" from the Mackinac Center for Public Policy for a special, discounted price of $15 postpaid. Limit one per person. Send check to Mackinac Center for Public Policy, P. O. Box 568, Midland, Mich., 48640.

Jul 04, 2008 08:02:11
AzMarc

Oh yes, we need smaller government.

Jul 04, 2008 08:16:55
6863m

Marc, I don't honestly think people have a good idea just how big and intrusive Government has gotten. Most just deal with it daily and don't think about what it is doing to the country. It is much like the debate about fuel. People first say what is the government going to do about it. What the Government ought to say is "well we got us where we are so I think is time for us to get out of the way for the next 20 years and then we will review it". Problem solved, and go to the next industry they have destroyed. Same thing with health care, can't even imagine what that will be like after managing that part of our economy for 20 years.

Jul 04, 2008 10:28:30
zzzinger

Name one "service" that our government runs efficiently. Not easy to do. The glaring example is the nugget of benevolent wisdom that controls most of it- U.S. Congress. It's a cesspool of corruption. Another is California's own state government. We still dont have a budget plan and the state is hemorrhaging from special interests partisan politics. It IS crazy out here.
For every new law passed the state should remove at least one. The same should apply to government "services".
You're dead on Wyatt. Don't stop.

Jul 04, 2008 11:41:05
MudSnow

zzzinger Wrote:

Quote: "
Name one "service" that our government runs efficiently.
"


Postal service.

Can't think of a second one right now, though.

Jul 04, 2008 12:11:26
AzMarc

MudSnow Wrote:

Quote: "
zzzinger Wrote:Quote:
Name one "service" that our government runs efficiently.
Postal service.
Can't think of a second one right now, though.
"


I disagree. With the advent of the internet and the ability to pay bills online, I would have thought that postal volume would be drastically reduced....But the postal service is still a huge organization.....

Jul 04, 2008 14:49:22
RWA73

Wyatt,i am 54 years old ,and i to live in mich. Wyatt it is a shame what this states government is doing to our beautiful land. Greg talks about (cesspool of corruption) in his state.....Greg my friend, you aut to come to mich. and check out our wonderful government in lansing! It gives new meaning to (cesspool of corruption) The best thing that could happen here is a well placed nuke in lansing
and detroit,it would get rid of about 99.9 % of mich. problems,agreed Wyatt?
Scott

Jul 04, 2008 14:58:41
6863m

I don't even agree with the Post Office if we just look at cost of the service. I am not qualified to address the efficiency of it. It is a protected enterprise. The main private package carriers have done quite well and better than the Post Office. If the package service was not subsidised by the protected letter delivery and stamps it would be pretty ugly. It should be put through a public private competition as soon as possible. The question is if given a choice which service would you use. We have to always remember that the Government only operates on fear. Every single thing they do is guided by force of reprisal.

Jul 04, 2008 15:34:37
bobmunch

I'll put it this way, there ain't much I ship by USPS anymore other than letters, the occasional bill payment, or a few small items. Mostly the USPS is incoming mail, not outgoing. I will admit that the private firms like UPS, FEDEX, and DHL have done a very good job in comparison to the current USPS.

It is an institution started by the government to take on a task of national proportions when there weren't many private groups to capable of dealing with more than states or counties. But those conditions no longer exist, and I would agree that maintaining a postal service as a government industry is no longer necessary. The government can maintain the necessity of a national postal service and put it out to bid, but it no longer needs to be conducting it.

Jul 04, 2008 16:22:10
comart45

bobmunch Wrote:

Quote: "
I'll put it this way, there ain't much I ship by USPS anymore other than letters, the occasional bill payment, or a few small items. Mostly the USPS is incoming mail, not outgoing. I will admit that the private firms like UPS, FEDEX, and DHL have done a very good job in comparison to the current USPS.
It is an institution started by the government to take on a task of national proportions when there weren't many private groups to capable of dealing with more than states or counties. But those conditions no longer exist, and I would agree that maintaining a postal service as a government industry is no longer necessary. The government can maintain the necessity of a national postal service and put it out to bid, but it no longer needs to be conducting it.
"


I agree.

Hey Wyatt, one thing I don't understand is why is the Mackinac Center located in Midland? Did Mackinac City move? Did Mackinac/Mackinaw Island sink?

Jul 04, 2008 18:28:41
zzzinger

I don't think USPS is a true government "service". The USPS receives no money from Congress. It was given a legal monopoly status in 1983 with government oversight it is supposed to turn a profit. Thats why we get all the junk mail. It pays the bills at USPS.

Jul 04, 2008 19:16:52
AL Bradley

wyatt Wrote: [quote]
I can not over emphisise the importance of free enterprise

As an example of the importance of free enterprise, Wyatt, please visit your nearest gasoline station. As a retired (local) government planner, I think your John Birch Society book review is a bunch of sh_t. AL Bradley

Jul 04, 2008 19:34:16
wyatt

....no offense Al....but you can't even spell shit right.
I do like your signature though, there is truth in advertising after all.

I will give this free enterprise theory a 2nd thought,... you may be right. All I know is I am sure my legs will fall asleep sitting on the toilet waiting for the Gov't to wipe my a$$.

Oh by the way Al, not John Birch.....but CATO... another mistake on your end.

Jul 04, 2008 21:01:52
6863m

Gregg, it is a true Government service in that by law only they can deliver mail. This monopoly allows them to charge whatever they need to cover costs of operation and you must pay it to send mail. The employees are part of the civil service system and protected by its rules and regulatons.

Jul 04, 2008 21:27:40
6863m

Gregg, I checked the funding sources for the post office and as usual with a Government subsidized business it is not what it seems. The USPS is to try to run like a business but if it needs anything it requsts supplemental funding from the current administration in budget requests.
They just requested $2.7 billion to pay for retiree health care costs. As an example in 2007 they showed a profit of $1.7 billion from the taxpayers buying stamps and getting mail. They acutally lost $1 billion. But they do not consider all the costs of the benefit packages they have given to the employees. In 2001 they requested $5 billion for capital improvements. It appears they don't have to consdider the cost of capital. These are the reasons we really don't know what the real cost of a stamp is and why public private competitions are difficult. With UPS and Fed Ex they have to cover all costs not half.

Jul 04, 2008 22:05:42
don4975



I will read all tjos wjen I can see romarroew

Jul 04, 2008 22:17:14
golf

ex and current government employees live in a cloisted enviorment
and you cant expect them to have same life experience.

Jul 05, 2008 01:08:56
DrewM

We have a BIG government-run CIA, FBI, Homeland Security Department, Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Coast Guard, Drug Enforcement Agency, Border Patrol, Veteran's Administration, federal prison system, Guantanamo Bay prison, the War in Iraq, the War in Afghanistan, U.S. troops in Korea (etc) . . .

Let's cut them way back, too while we're at it. Why is the complaint about Big Government only directed against certain programs?

How about less maintenance of federal roads? Less regulation of illegal aliens? No expensive border fence? Less regulation of air and water pollution? Less federal regulation of airline safety? Food safety? Consumer safety? Would you vote for a 10% cut in these programs? You would have some difficulty convincing Americans to cut nearly any of these programs.

While we're at it, let's eliminate the Secret Service, Federal Public Defenders, the National Archives, the Smithsonian, federal cemeteries management, all those surplus and redundant military bases voters love so much, the National Park System, the National Forest System, the Space Shuttle, NASA, those thousands of flags they run up the Capital Building flagpole every year to give away 'free' to voters, federal aid to education, the whole No Child Left Behind educational bureaucracy, that expensive Presidential Inauguration ceremony, the national Christmas tree (thousands of your valuable taxpayer dollars wasted!), all U.S. embassies, consulates, Air Force One (He can fly coach) . . . .

Look at all the wasteful money I'm saving you over-taxed taxpayers! While we're at it, let's eliminate nearly all government services. There's nothing the average American loves to do more than complain endlessly about taxes and Big Government, Big Government and taxes. Yet they vote these guys into office year after year.

Ronald Reagan doubled the federal deficit by the time he left office, and George W. Bush has done similar damage to the size of the federal government and its over-spending habits. Where's the outrage on Election Day? Oh, yeah, it's the "other guy" who's at fault, not my guy. Give me a break, ladies and gentlemen. You can go back to your complaining now.

Jul 05, 2008 04:26:21
wyatt

...DrewM,...your sillyness has much merit. Appx 20 yrs ago the Dems in Mi proposed cuts like that to call the Reps bluff, and guess what.......the Reps passed em. Haa. The Dems got in big trouble from their parasite constintuents

....You doubt reforms like you propose would pass?.....Put them on the ballot if you are so confident.

Jul 05, 2008 07:19:51
jauregui

AzMarc Wrote:

Quote: "
Oh yes, we need smaller government.
"


In some areas.

Jul 05, 2008 12:11:51
Rod H.

AzMarc Wrote:

Quote: "
MudSnow Wrote:Quote:
zzzinger Wrote:Quote:
Name one "service" that our government runs efficiently.
Postal service.
Can't think of a second one right now, though.
I disagree. With the advent of the internet and the ability to pay bills online, I would have thought that postal volume would be drastically reduced....But the postal service is still a huge organization.....
"


For over 12 years my step-son has worked for the post office in Oregon's capital, Salem. He says that when one thing, like bills, reduce in volume something else pops up to take it's place. One example is the big boom in Netflix rentals. Another would be Ebay sales, though he hasn't mentioned this specifically. He is concerned, and does forsee a time when total volume wil be dropping.

Jul 05, 2008 17:05:22
wyatt

...I like the post office....I think they do a good job.

Google
 
Web mgexperience.net


Return to Archive Index | Live Forums Front Page | Website Front Page

Please note this is an archived discussion.
If you would like to add a comment or question please follow this link:
Live discussion: MGB: ...real independence