taking vacuum advance from manifold

The MG Experience ~ MGB & GT Forum ~ Archives

MG MGB and MGB GT Tech Talk

If you would like to post a reply, please click below to visit the The MG Experience Forums:
MGB & GT Forum: taking vacuum advance from manifold
http://www.mgexperience.net/phorum/read.php?1,647356,page=1

Join the discussion, post your photos, or ask your own questions. Membership is FREE!




Oct 05, 2007 06:48:59
Pennsylvania MG

Hey everyone,

I picked up a pair of rebuilt HS-4's off eBay. The pair that had been on my car was taking vacuum advance from the rear carburetor; my new ones don't have that port.

I am using the pertronix distributor; can I take vacuum from the manifold? Is there a simple way to put a port on the manifold or will I have to have somebody install one?

Thanks for the advice,

Eric

Oct 05, 2007 06:59:45
gooser

never seen a hs4 without a port, but then i haven't seen many of them. in order to do what you suggest you WILL need to have your distributor recurved and possibly a new advance unit. otherwise you'll never get the timing right.





Oct 05, 2007 07:08:23
gooser

a much more suitable solution would be to install a vacuum port on the new carbs.

Oct 05, 2007 07:09:38
B-racer

The later model HS4s don't have vacuum ports. You can tee off of any vacuum line that runs from the manifold - there must be at least one vacuum port there?

Oct 05, 2007 07:28:32
Pennsylvania MG

Thanks,

Sorry for the ignorance but what/how would I tee off. The manifold has several bolts on it, would I just replace one with a plug of some sort and run the line through that?

-Eric

Oct 05, 2007 07:32:13
gooser

jeff, if his distrubtor was set up to use ported advance wouldn't it mess things up to run off manifold? you da distributoer expert here. maybe i'm wrong.

Oct 05, 2007 07:35:59
Pennsylvania MG

Drake,

It's not the original setup, it's the complete pertronix distributor. To be honest I'm not sure where exactly it's supposed to get the advance from, it was running fine from the carbs.

So I guess that's another question, where should I be getting the advance from?

Oct 05, 2007 09:48:54
B-racer

With the Pertronix distributor, it'll run better with ported vacuum from the carb. It'll still run better with manifold vacuum than with no vacuum advance at all, but not optimal. Actually, manifold vacuum versus no vacuum may be a wash in this case, since the Pertronix distributors offer 20 degrees of advance at the crank. I used to modify them to cut the amount of vacuum advance down by half in manifold vacuum applications. My question is WHY would you get rid of the stock carbs for the later moedl without the port? Not a good idea!

Oct 05, 2007 10:47:14
Pennsylvania MG

Thanks guys,

I suppose this is a case of buyer beware. I picked them up off ebay, they were listed as hs4's from a 1970, I assumed they would be the same as what I was swapping out.

-Eric

Oct 05, 2007 10:55:55
The Wiz

I ran my pertronix off manifold vacuum for a while, it sucked (pun intended), the main problem was that it was at full advance at idle, that pushed the idle speed way up, I adjusted that down using the idle screws but then pulling away from standstill the engine would stumble and hesitate badly as the advance suddenly dropped off.

I installed a port in my rear carb and it runs a whole lot better.

Oct 05, 2007 14:33:55
draymond

It also seemed to me when I ran the vacuum to the manifold, it seemed too strong and pulsed the distributer. I took it back off and I am assuming once I get around to porting to the carb, it wont be as strong at idle and wont pulse. Just a theory, I am not sure when I will get to it.

Oct 05, 2007 15:10:59
B-racer

You really need a special vacuum advance module to work with manifold vacuum. It needs to start advancing the timing at a relatively high level - 10" rather than 5-7. That way it drops the advance faster when you hit the gas, for less hesitation. For the 45D distributors, the '75 model year had the right unit. For 25D distributors, '73-'74 had the right unit. They can be retrofit to other years though! :-)

Pulsing is another issue. That has more to do with where the vacuum port is located on the manifold and what size the vacuum line is. The smaller the vacuum line, the steadier the signal. Also, the further you are from the center of the manifold, the better the signal, due to less crossover gas pulses from carb to carb.

Any carbs from AUD465 and newer (late 1970) don't have a vacuum port. That's where you need to talk with Jimmy Hilton to make that modification!!!

Oct 05, 2007 19:13:09
mac townsend

Pennsylvania MG Wrote:

Quote: "
Thanks guys,
I suppose this is a case of buyer beware. I picked them up off ebay, they were listed as hs4's from a 1970, I assumed they would be the same as what I was swapping out.
-Eric
"


what is the tag? AUDxxx, tag's on the float bowls. No tag=bad.

Contact Jimmie Hilton.

He may be able to swap you a rear carb (or set) at minimal cost.

Jimmie sells on ebay as well.

Remember: for carb rebuild/replacement, contact Jimmie or Hap.

For distributor rebuild/replacement, contact jeff.

eitehr will provide better advise and far better prices than the order takers at the mail order places. And on this sort of thing, avoid

Oct 06, 2007 00:29:33
graflexmaster

No ported advance on the carb? sounds like you got yourself a set of AUD465's

Oct 06, 2007 10:02:11
JM1NA

I have a set of 465's on my '80. Manifold vacuum. Runs nicely, but maybe this explains the slight hesitation I get when taking off from a stop.

Oct 06, 2007 16:33:00
gooser

IF you decide to hook up a port on your new carb it should be very easy to take both rear carbs to a machine shop, point at one and say this is what i want on the other in EXACTLY the same location.

Oct 08, 2007 12:52:23
Pennsylvania MG

Thanks again everyone, Jimmy had been recommended but I'm a sucker for eBay.

I don't have them at hand but I am pretty sure they're 465's.

-Eric

Oct 08, 2007 12:59:24
Speedracer

gooser Wrote:

Quote: "
IF you decide to hook up a port on your new carb it should be very easy to take both rear carbs to a machine shop, point at one and say this is what i want on the other in EXACTLY the same location.
"


It's not really a mchine shop, unless you don't own a drill, I convert carbs to port vaccum, make my hose nipple with a small piece of brake line, I drill and stop short of the body with brake line OD, then drill a 1/8 hole thru into the body, afix with epoxy or locktite, pretty simple job. Here's one I made for a HIF4.

Oct 08, 2007 13:01:32
Speedracer

Another picture

Oct 08, 2007 13:07:32
RSS

Hap, that looks pretty straight-forward. After making that change (from manifold vacuum to carb vacuum on an HIF4-equipped car), how badly would the Pertronix advance be affected?

R>

Oct 08, 2007 13:12:25
Speedracer

Thats a better question for Jeff than me. Ocassionally Jeff and I will calberate on a job, where he does the distributor and I do the SU carbs, that was the case on the vaccum ported HIF4, Jeff set the distributor up for vaccum port and when I was rebuilding the carbs, I install the vaccum port.

Oct 08, 2007 14:43:32
B-racer

Rick, the Pertronix really isn't affected at all. That's a separate deal, liek points. No affect from where the vacuum is taken. Only the amount of advance at idle changes (decreases) due to a reduction in vacuum at idle from the new port.

This is an archived discussion from the The MG Experience Forums

If you would like to post a reply, please click below to visit the The MG Experience Forums:
MGB & GT Forum: taking vacuum advance from manifold


Archive Index | The MG Experience Forums | Return to The MG Experience