MGB: Who Is The Real Cindy McCain?

This could explain everything.....

Desperate.

"DESPERATE" I think not. Someone needs to point out her husbands voting record when it comes to vets a troops.

dte

I agree desparate. Rick's big toe looks more like the Borg Queen than does Cindy McCain.

They're both HOT, and you will be assimilated!

P.S. That toe avatar is NASTY!

Any more desperate than the series of Obama Photoshop exercises you posted recently, Eric?

I'm not going to engage in making fun of anyone's looks. However, her calling the Obama campaign dirty shows me she might be certifiably crazy.

Funny--still, she can assimilate me into her gazillion dollar beer riches anytime.

dumb

And the Republicans are the mean ones.

Dave, maybe you don't care but can I ask you if there is anything you know of in the past about McCain and the military that would show him to be negative to the military.

Wouldn't it be more plausable that he had a reason and that the bill was really bad for the military when you strip away the flash and sound bite. There are two other great examples of the same sound bite mentality. Did you research why he voted no or just buy the sound bite.

McCain voted against Martin Luther Holiday therefore he is racist.
He voted no only because the Government could not afford to give another paid holiday to the employees of the Goverenment. So is he racist or fiscal conservative. He did not care if it was an unpaid national holiday, there are several.

His vote against the Iraq funding that Obama talks about.
The Democrats put a time line in the bill to force Bush to veto it and to try to force foreign policy through legislation. McCain voted no on the whole bill because of time lines and new that Bush had already said he would veto it. So did he vote to not fund the troops or did vote to protect the Iraq war from defeat.


Ryan, is she talking about the Obama campaign strategy of not releasing any informaiton and not being honest with the American People.

Why do people pay any attention to the wives anyway. RSS with his disgusting comments on people is shameful and piggish but I guess it his right but I am surpised people go along. I have not heard anything negative about Michelle Obama and she has as much controversy than Cindy McCain but she is off limits.

If I called her an overweight angry black woman who hates white people with some stupid picture this site would go nuts and rightfully so but it is OK to throw the cheap pictures and shots at Cindy McCain.

McCain completely missed 6 of 9 votes on veterans' issues. He was not[/i] a co-sponsor of the post-9/11 GI Bill.

If he cared about more than his [i]own service, he would be working for the troops.

A New GI Bill (2nd vote)...........06/26/2008 Not Voting
A New GI Bill (3rd vote)............06/26/2008 Not Voting
A New GI Bill (1st vote)............05/22/2008 Not Voting
Stopping a Second Rate GI Bill...05/14/2008 Not Voting
Enhanced Veterans' Benefits......04/24/2008 Not Voting
Expanded Veterans' Benefits......10/01/2007 Not Voting
Veterans' Health Care, 2008.......09/06/2007 Yea
Funding for MRAPS...................03/29/2007 Yea
Veterans' Health Care, 2007.......02/14/2007 Yea

This isn't about McCain. Suppose someone starts posting pics of Michelle Obama in an unsavory light. What do you think would happen?

Marc, if you go over to the thread on King and Michelle you will see the difference.

Suppose, while Bill Clinton was running for President, somebody had posted pictures of Hilary Clinton in an unflattering light? What do you think would have happened?

RSS, lookiing at the dates of the votes and what McCain and Obama were doing at the time proves you are clueless and beyond dangerous.

RSS Wrote:

AzMarc Wrote:

Marc... people on this site have posted unflattering photoshopped pictures of Michelle Obama. They have said unflattering things.

Personally I think Cindy McCain is an absolute knockout... and the Borg Queen is kinda hot to... in a "Night of the Living Dead" kinda way!

Steve64B Wrote:

Can you still see your toe?

RSS Wrote:

AzMarc Wrote:

RSS Wrote:

McCain didn't even show up to vote on this one. He couldn't be bothered.

RSS Wrote:

I think John McCain has just the campaign that suits him.

RSS Wrote:

Simon Wrote:

....RSS, come on over for dinner............

Got plans already, thanks.

........Aunt Jemima pancakes and Mrs Buttersworth?????? all you can eat!!!!!!!!!

wyatt Wrote:

6863m,

If you vote against a bill because of time lines, you cannot accuse the other candidate of not supporting the troops when he votes against a similar bill that includces time lines. Look in the miror. By the way, McCain appologized for voting against the Martin Luther King Holiday.

McCain can vote against any vet bill he wants but he made a statement the his reason was the bill would encourage soldiers to leave the service to take advantage of the benefits. Nice logic MR. McCain. Your not a Maverick, your a hoarses ass.

DTE
CW4 Ret Army

dte948 Wrote:

Richard,

Your point is well taken. My point is only this, if both bills benefit the troops, you vote for one and the other candidate votes for the other, you cannot claim he does not support the troops. McCain can stand his ground on time tables which is fine with me but don't tell a half truth which in my mind is a half lie.

Dave

Dave, I don't think McCain ever accused Obama of not supporting the troops realative to vetrans care and benefits. He has only done so on the issue of support for the combat roles.

Be honest about what they are doing. A Democrat has to worry about how we see them. Are they weak on National Defense and are they anti military. Democrats will not support the war fighting part of the effort when they can vote for the soft side and then say they support the troops. They try for both sides of the issue.

After Obama is elected he will begin to significantly cut back on Defense Department spending at the same time he will continue to talk about the soft support. In his mind it is easy to justify giving it is just very hard for him to use good spendable money on the hardware in the Defense Department. The unfortunate part is he will be laying off hundreds of thousands of high paying jobs in the private sector. You will see this in his first budget. He will follow the blueprint Jimmy Carter used.

Richard explained the reason McCain voted against the benefits bill well and he was clear why.

McCain was in a catch 22 on Martin Luther King and could not give any reason that would help him on the issue. Over 30% of the work force got a day off with pay what could he do now.

Richard,

Who said I was or am a "DEMOCRAT"?

Dave

Dave I am not sure who called you a Democrat I looked at all the posts. I referred to a Democrat. I actually could care less what you are doesn't matter to me. I only read your posts and comment on what you say.

If someone called my one though I would be more angry than all the other stupid names I have been called on this post. I can't be something I don't understand.

Richard,

Point Taken.

Dave

6863m Wrote:

Steve,

Try Dumb Ass. Even I understand that.

Dave

Dave,

In moments of pique, I have called Richard names. It’s not something I’m proud of, but I own up to it.

But now, I know how to wound him… to strike at his soft underbelly… I’ll tell him he’s thinking like a Democrat! He’ll go apoplectic. He may need medication to get his heart rate stable!

NAAAA, I’m not that mean! But I might say he’s thinking like a Libertarian.

;)