MGB & GT Forum
Heavy duty throwout bearing
Posted by rhinsb
Topic Creator (OP)
Sep 2, 2009 01:45 PM
Joined 17 years ago
1,299 Posts
|
http://www.bpnorthwest.com/.sc/ms/dd/ee/10592/Release Bearing Heavy Duty MGB
Anyone know anything about these? Good idea?
Anyone know anything about these? Good idea?
Sep 2, 2009 02:02 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 17 years ago
11,646 Posts
|
underdog
Jim Underwood
Pittsburgh, USA
Sign in to contact
1972 MG MGB
1980 Triumph TR8 "Fabulous Trashwagon" 1999 Chevrolet Corvette "Darth Vader" 1999 Chevrolet S10 "Spare Change" & more |
Sep 2, 2009 02:09 PM
Joined 16 years ago
10,355 Posts
|
There's been one in my car since I got it in 92. Funny thing is I was looking for some wiper blade screws for a friend when I came across another one in my parts stash. Says made in UK with a number. I must have saved it from a parts car a long time ago. It's a little dirty but still turns nice & smooth. I think they were a great idea and don't understand why the quit making them. Hopefully the quality on this one is good because the concept is great IMO.
Topic Creator (OP)
Sep 2, 2009 02:50 PM
Joined 17 years ago
1,299 Posts
|
Sep 2, 2009 03:01 PM
Joined 17 years ago
1,694 Posts
|
Sep 2, 2009 04:55 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 20 years ago
20,161 Posts
|
You will get varying opinions as to whether the bearing style TO bearings are better. Personally, I've never had any trouble with the carbon units.
A few years ago I saw a throwout bearing that was an annular piston/cylinder. It bolted to the transmission housing (like a donut around the input shaft) and the hydraulic line connected directly to it - it eliminated the lever altogether. Personally, I think that might have been the best solution, but I've never seen them since.
Terry Ingoldsby
terry.ingoldsby@DCExperts.com
A few years ago I saw a throwout bearing that was an annular piston/cylinder. It bolted to the transmission housing (like a donut around the input shaft) and the hydraulic line connected directly to it - it eliminated the lever altogether. Personally, I think that might have been the best solution, but I've never seen them since.
Terry Ingoldsby
terry.ingoldsby@DCExperts.com
Sep 2, 2009 05:08 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 17 years ago
11,646 Posts
|
Well, I ordered one because I have to change the TO and well, what the heck!
About an hour after they confirmed the order they sent another email saying they had to modify the order... they were going to charge me less for the shipping!
Yea... price going down!
Good customer service!
Terry, this might have been what you saw:
http://www.cambridgemotorsport.com/MGB-Co-axial-Hydraulic-Clutch-Release-Kit
About an hour after they confirmed the order they sent another email saying they had to modify the order... they were going to charge me less for the shipping!
Yea... price going down!
Good customer service!
Terry, this might have been what you saw:
http://www.cambridgemotorsport.com/MGB-Co-axial-Hydraulic-Clutch-Release-Kit
Sep 2, 2009 05:11 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 19 years ago
4,254 Posts
|
davidsauer1
David Sauer
Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Sign in to contact
|
Sep 2, 2009 05:16 PM
Joined 17 years ago
3,091 Posts
|
Steve64B Wrote:
Those guys are great. I order from them all the time.
Quote:
Well, I ordered one because I have to change the TO and well, what the heck!
About an hour after they confirmed the order they sent another email saying they had to modify the order... they were going to charge me less for the shipping!
Yea... price going down!
Good customer service!
Terry, this might have been what you saw:
http://www.cambridgemotorsport.com/MGB-Co-axial-Hydraulic-Clutch-Release-Kit
About an hour after they confirmed the order they sent another email saying they had to modify the order... they were going to charge me less for the shipping!
Yea... price going down!
Good customer service!
Terry, this might have been what you saw:
http://www.cambridgemotorsport.com/MGB-Co-axial-Hydraulic-Clutch-Release-Kit
Those guys are great. I order from them all the time.
Sep 2, 2009 05:18 PM
Joined 18 years ago
52 Posts
|
Never had a problem with the carbon TOBs on MGBs
On mustangs, however....the bearing type ones are held into the clutch fork by small spring clips that break.
Score one for MGBs!
Erich
1972 MGB-450,000+ miles (seen a few engines tho) undergoing floor/sill replacement
1989 Mustang DIY twin turbo
1997 Mustang Built Lincoln 4V motor Procharger d1SC
On mustangs, however....the bearing type ones are held into the clutch fork by small spring clips that break.
Score one for MGBs!
Erich
1972 MGB-450,000+ miles (seen a few engines tho) undergoing floor/sill replacement
1989 Mustang DIY twin turbo
1997 Mustang Built Lincoln 4V motor Procharger d1SC
Sep 2, 2009 05:23 PM
Joined 24 years ago
12,897 Posts
|
My most recent luck with a carbon release bearing was replacing one last Nov. after 76K miles. It was part of an AP Borg & Beck kit that had been installed back in the early 90s, and finally blew up last year. They can survive longer than mine did, but many don't, probably depending more on who markets what than anything inherent in the concept or design.
It would be nice to have more info on this T/O bearing ~ who makes it, is it really a direct replacement, what has been other folks experience with these? There is nothing inherently bad about trying to use a roller bearing T/O bearing, but there needs to be some history and specifics on this particular (or any other) unit for folks to be able to make an informed decision.
It would be nice to have more info on this T/O bearing ~ who makes it, is it really a direct replacement, what has been other folks experience with these? There is nothing inherently bad about trying to use a roller bearing T/O bearing, but there needs to be some history and specifics on this particular (or any other) unit for folks to be able to make an informed decision.
SafetyFast
Shareef Hassan
|
Sep 2, 2009 05:29 PM
Joined 16 years ago
573 Posts
|
I am curious about the throw-out bearing. Anyone have any negative experinces with this roller bearing. Seems like a great idea in theory. The last roller bearings I heard wore out prematurely from constant contact, and Doug Jackson used to offer a kit with a spring to give some clearance. I thought Moss discontinued carrying them because the quality was hit or miss.
I wore my last carbon faced one out in 2500 miles, but this is with a HD clutch plate. My foolishness, for ordering the HD components. I ordered a normal clutch plate, but the car is not together yet.
Thanks
I wore my last carbon faced one out in 2500 miles, but this is with a HD clutch plate. My foolishness, for ordering the HD components. I ordered a normal clutch plate, but the car is not together yet.
Thanks
Member Services:
Unique parts for 4-cylinder MGB
|
Sep 2, 2009 05:39 PM
Joined 19 years ago
2,039 Posts
|
I had good sucess with the carbon bearing, but I also don't sit at traffic lights with the pedal down. IIRC there was a problem with the roller bearing type wearing prematurely because the large diamater slave cylinder kept enough pressure on them to keep it running. At one time there was a link showing a modification that pulled it back slightly to prevent that. A search may turn it up, but it has been several years ago.
John
John
Sep 2, 2009 05:42 PM
Joined 15 years ago
1,337 Posts
|
As Shareef mentioned the main problem with the roller bearing is constant rotation and early wear. Found this in the archives of British cars. net:
There is no pull off spring for the throw out arm and bearing to pull the bearing (carbon block) off of the thrust surface of the pressure plate and as a result the bearing is in constant contact with the rotating surface. This is a very light contact and doesn't contribute wear on the carbon block, but it is sufficient to keep a modern, ball bearing spinning constantly which results in the lubricant drying out, causing premature failure of the bearing. Doug Johnson of British Automotive used to have a modification kit to add a pull off spring. This spring is mandatory if one is going to use a ball bearing type of throw out bearing.
There is no pull off spring for the throw out arm and bearing to pull the bearing (carbon block) off of the thrust surface of the pressure plate and as a result the bearing is in constant contact with the rotating surface. This is a very light contact and doesn't contribute wear on the carbon block, but it is sufficient to keep a modern, ball bearing spinning constantly which results in the lubricant drying out, causing premature failure of the bearing. Doug Johnson of British Automotive used to have a modification kit to add a pull off spring. This spring is mandatory if one is going to use a ball bearing type of throw out bearing.
Topic Creator (OP)
Sep 2, 2009 06:45 PM
Joined 17 years ago
1,299 Posts
|
Forums
Having trouble posting or changing forum settings?
Read the Forum Help (FAQ) or contact the webmaster